Google Ads Spend vs GA4 ROAS (layout variant)
Alternate layout for the same Google Ads versus GA4 ROAS narrative, useful for comparing presentation styles.
Remarketing and Non-brand Search are the strongest return drivers in the most recent complete week. I used Google Ads spend and GA4 revenue together 09/05/2026 - 15/05/2026. That gives a clearer picture of where budget is paying back and where it is only adding cost.
| Campaign | Spend | Clicks | Conversions | GA4 Revenue | ROAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand Search | GBP 5,100 | 1,580 | 258 | GBP 63,400 | 12.4x |
| Non-brand Search | GBP 7,200 | 2,540 | 204 | GBP 95,600 | 13.3x |
| Shopping | GBP 4,800 | 1,760 | 168 | GBP 61,200 | 12.8x |
| Remarketing | GBP 2,300 | 710 | 138 | GBP 48,500 | 21.1x |
| Performance Max | GBP 6,400 | 1,980 | 162 | GBP 58,900 | 9.2x |
| Display Prospecting | GBP 3,100 | 780 | 44 | GBP 17,600 | 5.7x |
The difference is expected: Google Ads is click-based while GA4 is session-based, so the same campaign can be credited differently. The revenue curve is still moving ahead of spend, which means the account is healthy overall.
The practical action is to protect the return on Remarketing and Non-brand Search before increasing spend anywhere else. That is the cleanest next step for the business.
Remarketing is the cleanest scale candidate because it combines the best ROAS with steady click volume. If you want the safest budget increase, that is the least risky place to start. Data used here was the same week’s Google Ads and GA4 performance data.
Watch whether Non-brand Search keeps its return while spend rises. If ROAS starts slipping, the scale-up is too aggressive and the budget move stops being good for the business.